Your answer is: not much. It is assumed by courtroom experts who have been following the trial that it will be necessary at some stage of the proceedings for Mason to put his client on the stand, and at that time it is almost certain that she will be forced to change her statement that she was not at the beach city on the night of the murder. Too strong an array of facts and of witnesses have been piled up to enable her to consistently maintain her original position that she did not leave the Monadnock Hotel Apartments where she was living on the night in question. Then, Mason said, I want bail fixed for her, and when you get a judge to fix bail, I want you to make the claim that the fifty thousand dollars worth of jewels is merely so much newspaper talk that its easy to say fifty thousand dollars in round figures, but that for the purposes of fixing bail we want to know exactly what jewelry was taken otherwise well consider that the jewelry had only a nominal value and that bail should be fixed at a very nominal amount. Well, I saw your client today. When I figure it out Ill let you know. Got a question. I understand that contractors and other service people come in through the rear entrance. Probably a deer, Dino. Larkin could not possibly have beat us here. Very definitely. When I say that the weapon was about eighteen to twenty inches from the decedent, I mean the distance from the muzzle of the weapon to the chest of the decedent was not more than that. He stopped running and said,Yeah? I started up the stairs. And did you find it? Is there any proof that the defendant was riding in the automobile with the decedent when it was driven up to that house? Judge Hoyt asked. Were there any latent fingerprints of the defendant in the automobile? A womans purse. Her smile parted the heavens. She was one of those slight, efficient blondes whose comeliness almost distracts from her skills as a planner and organizer. Why would the killer be contacting you?.